Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
[内含私货,谨慎观看]科幻江湖|“小破球”票房破40亿,多部科幻剧续订or开机,ChatGPT类AI迎来爆发……

第五发言人:随便拿人稿子好像不大好,不过既然是新闻就无所谓了。顺带一提这周可能会出新一期的幻报,这两天频道也可能没人维护,因为我已经进行完修复准备回考试星球了,其他发言人暂时不在(什么破Gboard老是断字)



tg-me.com/First_Foundation/163
Create:
Last Update:

[内含私货,谨慎观看]科幻江湖|“小破球”票房破40亿,多部科幻剧续订or开机,ChatGPT类AI迎来爆发……

第五发言人:随便拿人稿子好像不大好,不过既然是新闻就无所谓了。顺带一提这周可能会出新一期的幻报,这两天频道也可能没人维护,因为我已经进行完修复准备回考试星球了,其他发言人暂时不在(什么破Gboard老是断字)

BY 基地-Foundation


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283

Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/First_Foundation/163

View MORE
Open in Telegram


基地 Foundation Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Should You Buy Bitcoin?

In general, many financial experts support their clients’ desire to buy cryptocurrency, but they don’t recommend it unless clients express interest. “The biggest concern for us is if someone wants to invest in crypto and the investment they choose doesn’t do well, and then all of a sudden they can’t send their kids to college,” says Ian Harvey, a certified financial planner (CFP) in New York City. “Then it wasn’t worth the risk.” The speculative nature of cryptocurrency leads some planners to recommend it for clients’ “side” investments. “Some call it a Vegas account,” says Scott Hammel, a CFP in Dallas. “Let’s keep this away from our real long-term perspective, make sure it doesn’t become too large a portion of your portfolio.” In a very real sense, Bitcoin is like a single stock, and advisors wouldn’t recommend putting a sizable part of your portfolio into any one company. At most, planners suggest putting no more than 1% to 10% into Bitcoin if you’re passionate about it. “If it was one stock, you would never allocate any significant portion of your portfolio to it,” Hammel says.

That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.

基地 Foundation from ua


Telegram 基地-Foundation
FROM USA